WHY PROTESTERS GATHERED OUTSIDE PETER THIEL’S MANSION THIS WEEKEND By Anna Wiener ~ THE NEW YORKER

Wiener-WhyProtestersGatheredOutsidePeterThielsMansion-800

Peter Thiel’s Palantir Technologies makes software that can aid in the roundup of undocumented immigrants.
PHOTOGRAPH BY BRUNO LEVY / CHALLENGES-REA / REDUX

~~~

On Saturday afternoon, a group of about fifty tech workers, attorneys, anti-surveillance activists, and other Bay Area denizens stood outside a three-story, nine-bedroom, twenty-five-million-dollar mansion. It is the home of the investor, entrepreneur, and Trump adviser Peter Thiel, who co-founded Palantir Technologies, in 2004. Thiel’s house is located on what is known as Billionaires’ Row, in San Francisco’s tony Pacific Heights, close to the Lyon Street Steps. Old-money heirs such as the Getty and Traina families, and software-industry giants, including Larry Ellison, the co-founder of Oracle, have homes nearby. Thiel’s address is not publicly listed, but Sonja Trauss, a Bay Area housing activist who, together with her colleague Laura Foote Clark, had organized the protest, was fairly certain that she had it right. “He lived there as of September 26th,” she said. Last fall, Thiel invited Trauss for breakfast to discuss local housing policy. Trauss recalled that she ate oatmeal, that Thiel had “some little quiches with a salad,” and that she had been struck by the house’s interior décor; the walls were gray with white molding, and pictures—“cityscapes, countryscapes, inoffensive stuff”—were hung in odd locations. “Places where you don’t put a picture, like too close to a ceiling or poking onto the window,” she said. “I just imagined the interior decorator being, like, ‘Peter, I have a vision.’ ”

Trauss and Clark organized the rally in response to a report, published in The Intercept earlier this month, that a software program known as Investigative Case Management (I.C.M.), developed by Palantir Technologies for the Department of Homeland Security, will now also be used to facilitate and expedite the work of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.). The program is part of a forty-two-million-dollar contract drafted in 2014, and collects data such as telephone records, addresses, social-media content, immigration history, biometric traits, and criminal records. For anyone concerned about the potential for mass deportations under President Trump, I.C.E.’s use of this software is an alarming development. (A privacy-impact assessment filed in 2016 states that the database can be used to aid in criminal and civil cases against immigrants, including “exclusion, deportation, and removal proceedings.”) The protest was less for Thiel’s benefit, Trauss said, than to raise awareness among his employees. “These people are our friends,” she said, of the tech workers employed by Palantir and other Thiel-affiliated companies. “We’re not coming at it after spending years being, like, ‘Tech workers, go home, you’re scum, you’re ruining our city,’ like some of the other immigration activists. Our immediate network is the very people who are waking up every day and spending all day coding this system.”

The tech industry has long been criticized for failing to acknowledge its own complicity in social problems while adopting change-the-world rhetoric. Since the Presidential election, some of these concerns have become impossible to ignore. Earlier this year, nearly three thousand tech workers signed the Never Again pledge, promising not to work on any databases that the Trump Administration might use to target vulnerable groups. (The name is a nod to I.B.M.’s alleged role, during the Second World War, in systematizing Nazi genocide by providing punch-card technology.) Engineers at Palantir are unusually well-positioned to resist within their workplace, Trauss argues. “Sometimes resistance looks like incompetence,” she said. She had prepared a small zine for distribution at the protest, on the back of which was printed Étienne de La Boétie’s essay “Discourse on Voluntary Servitude,” from the sixteenth century. A single sentence was printed in bold: “It is not necessary to deprive him of anything, but simply to give him nothing.”

~~~  READ MORE  ~~~

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s