Interior officials and Senators from river states begin trip to work toward agreement on water cuts 

By Joshua Partlow

April 3, 2023

Water flows along Lake Powell in Page, Ariz., in October. (Joshua Lott/The Washington Post)

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. — The abundant snow in the Rocky Mountains this year has been a welcome relief but is not enough to overcome two decades of drought that has pushed major reservoirs along the Colorado River down to dangerous levels, Camille Calimlim Touton, the commissioner for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, said on Monday at the outset of a three-day trip along the river with a bipartisan delegation of senators to push for an agreement on how to conserve an unprecedented amount of water.

The snowpack that feeds the Colorado River — which 40 million people rely on in the West — is currently at 154 percent of average for this time of year, Touton said.

“This is great thing for this year. But it doesn’t solve a 23-year drought,” she said. “We’re here to find a solution together.”

The trip comes as negotiations between the seven states of the Colorado River basin have stalled, with California proposing one plan for cuts and the other six states — Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming and Utah — offering another. The Interior Department is expected to publish an environmental review later this month intended to clarify its authority to make unilateral cuts to water usage and how those could be distributed if the states don’t reach an agreement.

Colorado Democratic Sens. Michael F. Bennet and John Hickenlooper joined Wyoming Sen. Cynthia M. Lummis (R) for the trip, which is expected to include visits to Arizona, Nevada, and California — the Lower Basin states where the most contentious decisions will need to be made to reach the scale of cuts that the federal government is calling for.

“The future of the American West is at stake,” Bennet told reporters.

In June, Touton issued an unprecedented ultimatum to the Colorado River basin states: cut consumption by 2 to 4 million acre feet or the federal government would intervene.

The federal government made that demand as it became clearer that the major reservoirs along the river, Lake Powell and Lake Mead, were falling to levels that threatened the ability to produce hydropower on their dams and even risked a collapse in the water supply for millions of people.

Since then, the states have yet to resolve their differences. In January, the six states agreed to an approach that would cut 1.5 million acre-feet by attributing losses mostly to evaporation of the water as the river travels through a network of reservoirs and canals in the southern states on its way to Mexico.

That method would translate to particularly large cuts for California, which uses the biggest share of the river.

California has rejected that approach and said that it goes against the long-standing system of water rights that has been established over more than a century. Under laws and court rulings dating back decades, in times of shortage, Arizona would lose its right to its water before California.

California’s plan calls for more gradual initial reductions that intensify as reservoirs fall further, hitting Arizona particularly hard. Arizona water authorities view the California plan as impossible for their state to stomach.

Some observers feel the federal government has not done enough to find a solution to the impasse. The longer the dispute drags on — and particularly if it descends into litigation — many worry that the reservoirs could continue to deteriorate.

“There are discussions going on but they’re not making much progress. The level of distrust and animosity is really remarkable,” said Bruce Babbitt, the former governor of Arizona and the Interior secretary under President Bill Clinton, said in an interview.

Babbitt, who left Interior in 2001, has been critical of how the department has handled the crisis. He said President Biden should appoint a mediator to negotiate a solution among the states, something people involved with the talks say is unlikely to happen.

Interior officials, as well as some state water officials, dispute Babbit’s characterization. They say top officials, including Reclamation’s Touton and Interior Deputy Secretary Tommy Beaudreau, have been actively involved in meeting with different parties on the river trying to help the states reach consensus.

~~~ CONTINUE ~~~

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s