The Peruvian term ‘Pacha’ ~ Psyche Ideas


An aerial view of the Peruvian Andes. Photo by Moises Saiman/Magnum


The Quechua term ‘pacha’ embodies an Andean worldview that sees everything as related, transcending narrow self-interest

.Jorge Sanchez Perezis an assistant professor at the Department of Philosophy of the University of Alberta in Canada.


When I was at high school in Peru, I was required to read Gabriel García Márquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude (1967). I was told that it was not only a classic piece of literature, but also that it was a great representative of Latin American magical realism, a style that is meant to provide the reader with a realistic description of places or events alongside weird or unbelievable elements. For me, the book felt like just another conversation with my grandparents or different members of my family, and therefore something I really could not see as fascinating on its own terms.

Several years later, and after travelling around the world for work and studies, it finally clicked. The perspective about reality that I’d carried with me since childhood, one that involved considering mountains as sacred beings, acknowledging the presence of unseen spirits, or thinking that rituals could effectively change reality, was not the rule for most people – especially not in the West. The more I think about the many occasions when my intuitions about reality were at odds with those of friends from countries like the United Kingdom, Canada or the United States, the more I realise that there are some fundamental assumptions about reality that might be implicit and yet relevant to each of us.

Making use of my training in philosophy, I have found that a term from the Quechua language – the most spoken Indigenous language family in the Americas – could help me make sense of many of the implicit views that I held. The term is pacha, and its meaning is as complex and subtle as the reality that it helps explain.

Pacha is a polysemantic word that, in a sense, contains multitudes. In Quechua, plurality is described by adding the word kuna at the end of other words. So, we could say that there is not a single pacha but pachakunaPacha is time and space and a moment in time and space. It is important to highlight that the relationship between those two elements makes it hard, if not impossible, to disentangle them.

If, for example, I want to talk about the exact moment in which our existence is taking place, we qualify the pacha with the reference point of kay. That is, we would say kay pacha to talk about the here and now. But, on the other hand, to talk about different planes of existence would require me to qualify pacha with hanan (superior), ukhu (below), and hawa (beyond) – locations in reality. Pacha, then, seems to be a point of reference that Andean people use to discuss all other points of reference. According to the Andean scholar Zénon Depaz Toledo writing in 2015, another way to understand pacha is as the ‘totality of the world’ or ‘that which makes the world’.

Across the world, understanding reality as a set of relationships and bonds that pre-exist any kind of individual selfseems more fitting

Pacha, then, with all of its complexities, seems to open the door to understanding reality in a way that might seem foreign to a Western audience. If reality is everything, how could everything disentangle itself from itself?

In Democracy in America (1835-40), Alexis de Tocqueville wrote that, in the US, philosophy is least studied, and yet the precepts of René Descartes are best applied. The idea that many people in the Western world assume that the first point of reality is the self, the Cartesian ego, rings true to me – at least, that is my impression after living here for almost 10 years.

Yet, for many people across the world – myself included – understanding reality as a set of relationships and bonds that pre-exist any kind of individual self seems more fitting. This, of course, comes with a humility that does not seem to be present in some current practices. If the entirety of reality pre-exists my awareness of it, how could we be the masters of something such as the world in which we live?

Such questions were not appreciated in the 16th century Andes. At that time, clergy members denounced Andean idolatries, declaring them the largest obstacle to the Catholic faith in Peru. For that reason, some argued, it was necessary to extirpate those views by destroying all the sacred places and religious figures that held meaning for the Andean people.

Part of that process included the actions of the priest Francisco de Ávila who, in order to carry out his mission effectively, ordered the compilation of what is now known as the Huarochirí Manuscript. The reasoning was simple: to destroy something completely, you have to know what it is. This text contains stories from mythical times and other stories usually passed down via oral tradition. It also contained the locations in which those mythical events took place, along with information about the practices people embraced that, even if secretly, carried spiritual meaning. With this text at hand and keeping it a secret even from his superiors, Ávila efficiently carried out his eradication efforts. That is, tens of thousands were effectively converted when presented with options such as torture or dispossession.

This text was found hundreds of years later in the library of Madrid, allowing us a further glimpse into the complexity of Andean traditional views. The Peruvian anthropologist José María Arguedas, who translated the text into Spanish in 1966, called the document ‘the most important Quechua work of those in existence’. One could rightly consider this book as an Andean bible due to the significance of the narrations it contains. The irony is hard to miss here. The tool meant to be used by the Catholic Church, an iconic Western institution, to destroy Andean worldviews might be one of our best resources to reconstruct it and renew the tradition.

In its 31 chapters, the book gives us an unparalleled portrayal of reality seen through the eyes of those Indigenous Quechua speakers who were alive in the 16th century. In particular, the story of Pariacaca – the main deity of Huarochirí – is worth mentioning in connection to the idea of pacha. Chapter 16 tells the story of Pariacaca, now a mountain one can visit in the central Peruvian Andes. Details about his exploits and how he fought the pre-existing local deity can be skipped for now. However, his origins seem worthy of discussion. In the text, it is claimed that Pariacaca was born from five eggs. Five eggs hatched at the same time and gave us a unique yet five-fold being.

A possible way to read this is by highlighting the relational nature of existence – a person could be understood as being a single self – or by way of highlighting the different relations that it holds in existence. For example, I am somebody’s brother, but also somebody’s husband, as well as somebody’s parent. All these things could be said to be me. If time and space are in a relationship that cannot allow for disentanglement, why would I be able to disentangle myself from the world and my relationships in it at any given moment?

Pariacaca, although a deity, is still a reality in the world. I, although a self, am still the relationships that tie me to the world. Pacha can be said to capture this complex and dynamic set of relationships that make us who we are in a world in which we continue to exist and from which we cannot break away.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s